@article{moroney2021updating,
  title = {Updating the Typology of Definiteness: {{Evidence}} from Bare Nouns in {{Shan}}},
  shorttitle = {Updating the Typology of Definiteness},
  author = {Moroney, Mary},
  year = {2021},
  month = apr,
  volume = {6},
  pages = {1--28},
  publisher = {{Ubiquity Press}},
  issn = {2397-1835},
  doi = {10.5334/gjgl.1221},
  abstract = {This paper demonstrates that bare nouns in Shan (Tai-Kadai) can express both unique and anaphoric definiteness, a distinction first noted by Schwarz (2009). This pattern of data as well as similar patterns found in Serbian and Kannada motivate adding a category to the typology of definiteness marking described by Jenks (2018) to include languages that allow bare nouns to express anaphoric definiteness. An extended type-shifting analysis offers an account of the availability of bare noun anaphora, as well as the other bare noun interpretations, such as the indefinite, generic, and kind interpretations. Variation in the use of bare nouns versus more marked anaphoric expressions is tied to pragmatic factors such as what anaphoric definite expressions are available in the language, contrast, information structure, and potential ambiguity of nominal expressions. This account proposes that a constrained semantic account of the interpretations of nominal expressions combined with a pragmatic account of their use can model much of the cross-linguistic data on definiteness.},
  journal = {Glossa: a journal of general linguistics},
  keywords = {anaphora,bare nouns,definiteness,familiarity,type shifting,uniqueness},
  language = {en},
  number = {1}
}